首页> 外文OA文献 >Are Incentives Without Expertise Sufficient? Evidence From Fortune 500 Firms
【2h】

Are Incentives Without Expertise Sufficient? Evidence From Fortune 500 Firms

机译:没有专业知识的激励措施是否足够?来自《财富》 500强企业的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Agency theory predicts that incentives will align agents\u27 interests with those of principals. However, the resource-based view suggests that to be effective, the incentive to deliver must be paired with the ability to deliver. Using Fortune 500 boards as an empirical context, this study shows that the presence of directors who lack top-level experience but own large shareholdings is negatively associated with firm value, an effect that increases in the number of such directors. Firm value rises after such directors depart from boards, with the greatest increases occurring when many of these directors leave. While agency theory highlights the importance of the right incentives being in place, this research suggests that this can be ineffective if the right resources are not also in place.
机译:代理理论预测,激励将使代理人的利益与委托人的利益保持一致。但是,基于资源的观点表明,要有效,交付动机必须与交付能力相匹配。以《财富》 500强董事会为经验背景,该研究表明,缺乏顶级经验但拥有大量股份的董事的存在与公司价值负相关,这种影响增加了此类董事的人数。此类董事离开董事会后,公司价值上升,其中最大的增长发生在许多董事离开时。尽管代理理论强调了适当激励措施的重要性,但这项研究表明,如果还没有适当的资源,这可能是无效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号